requestId:684c3e22e9e371.37665703.
The obscurity of “certification method” and the purified trend of contemporary academic thinking
——Analysis example of Liu Qingping’s Confucian “paradox” criticism
Author: Korean Peace (produced by the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences in Beijing)
Source: “Qinghua University Journal. Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition” 2020 Issue 3
Time: Gengzi, April 19th, Jiashen
� Dismissal or unobserved “certification law” will lead to a purifying understanding, that is, the generalization and monopoly of thinking. One of the protruding manifestations of this trend in the field of science research in contemporary people is to deprecate the “contradiction” in philosophical meaning into the “paradox” in logical meaning. Liu Qingping has had a series of criticisms about Confucian ethics in the past decade, comparing this erectile stylistically and its persecutions that can arise. The dual relationship between Confucian “filial piety and brotherhood” and “benevolence” supports each other and restricts each other. It is the result of theoretical discussion on the dual attributes of social-patriarchal law that exist in the real realm, and it is also the most basic guarantee for Confucianism’s practical vitality. The so-called logical “criticism” that is partially verbal and emotional, does not help remind the real origin of Confucianism’s elusive power, and it also obsesses the inherent richness of the Confucianism tradition, but can instead form an absolute limitation on the deepening of the subject’s own thinking.
Keywords: Certification method; perversion; filial piety and brotherhood; benevolence; professional ethics
In the second half of the 20th century, the popularity of the concept of “certification method” has exceeded almost all other philosophical models. The so-called “one part is two” and “against one” were also marked by Qing Ling in various different verbal situations from the Hall to the Jianghu. However, the vulgarization of the understanding and application of “certification methods” is also a popular social thought that has surpassed almost all other philosophical models, and has finally attracted widespread social thoughts. After the end of the 20th century, as a counter-attack, it seemed that it had become a fashion to dispel the “certification method”. [1] Being trapped by this tide, the academic world has also developed a trend, that is, to understand the influence of emotional logic in a single aspect, and to be inferior or even deny the influence of “certification method” in the process of understanding, to convert the “contradictory” in philosophical meaning into “paradical” in logical meaning, to equal the simplification of thinking to the conclusiveness of theory, and to judge the shortness of academic thinking from such perspectives. In fact, the proof method is a manifestation of the inherent connection, developmentality and subjective existence of the inherent existence of the object world. It will not truly dissipate due to the temporality and abandonment of desire. However, in terms of the specific thinking process, the lack of visual or exclusion of proof method will inevitably lead to the purity of cognition. This tendency is for the contemporaryThe concepts and methods of human science research have already produced obvious persecution. As far as the author knows, Liu Qingping’s series of criticisms about the various so-called “paradoxes” in history are more prominent in this issue and also attract more attention to classic examples. It analyzes the problems existing in Liu Qingping’s “paradoxes” criticism, and reflects on promoting the discussion of contemporary science research methods, which may provide unhelpful borrowing. Of course, the “purification” mentioned in this article is intended to emphasize the absolute impact of specific theorems on the effectiveness of thinking, and the actresses who face specific learning are the heroines of the story. In the book, the heroine uses this writer to specifically discuss the evaluation of her academic level and has different opinions. Liu Qingping’s “paradical” criticism involves ancient and modern times, both in China and the West, but it has produced the most extensive influence and is also relatively sufficient in its arguments. The first criticism of Confucian ethical thinking is recommended. This article analysis is important to rely on his works in this regard. [2]
1. How to understand the so-called “paradical” of logic?
Confucianism says that purity originated from the tradition of the Western Zhou Dynasty’s civilization, especially the Western Zhou Dynasty. Its focus is benevolence. This benevolence concept is rooted in the concept of filial piety and brotherhood as the ethics of bloody men. It is suitable for the filial piety and brotherhood within the bloody men’s group. The filial piety and brotherhood structure has become the conditions and foundation of the benevolence concept. Benevolence means the promotion and retention of filial piety and brotherhood in a more extensive national model. BaoqingIn modern times, especially after the May Fourth Movement, criticism and even denial of Confucianism gradually became the mainstream trend of society. Although the 1990s of the 20th century saw a major rejuvenation of Confucianism, the prejudice against the Chinese civilization tradition represented by Confucianism can still be deeply rooted in the context of the whole society. Some of the denials of Confucianism in modern times need to advance from the influence of its social civilization and clear up the crimes it committed in Chinese history such as “killing people with reason”; some of them need to advance from the historical landscape of its development, and believe that it is the ideological form of the natural economic era of agriculture and can no longer exist. The positive influence of the modern and post-modern society was developed; some should be based on the actual setbacks encountered by China since modern times, and to prove that as the mainstream ideological form of traditional China, Confucianism will inevitably lead to social cessation and backwardness. Therefore, to realize China’s rejuvenation, we must first take the remnant influence of the Qing Confucianism. Liu Qingping’s choice was to try to get started from logic, demonstrating that there is a “deep-level paradox” in Confucian ethics thinking, which not only formed a bad influence in history, but also forbidden the thinking of contemporary people, becoming a warm bed for the real corruption of reproduction: “Whether Confucius and Mencius’ own self-will, it is to try to realize social morality on the basis of family private morality, andThat is, to use Confucian methods to unite private morality and private morality, but the end of the matter and willingness is exactly: in the event of conflict, they will eventually deny social morality by using family morality, which will lead to a deep paradox in Confucian ethics. ”[3] “For the reproduction and expansion of certain unsightly corrupt phenomena in the real life, the bloody and truthful energy of Confucianism should also be said to be difficult to describe the responsibility it should bear. At the same time, due to the long-term influence of Confucian tradition in modern thinking history, especially its profound influence on the ideological structure of civilized nations that particularly value “emotion”, we should not underestimate its warm-bed effect in inducing these corruption phenomena.” [4] “The Confucian concept of group nature of ‘benevolence’ has determined a traditional sense of matter in human life: ‘If it does not harm others, it should love and help others’… On the other hand, Confucianism does not regard group nature’ Benevolence’ is considered as the basis of origin, but rather as the basis of group ‘loyalty and filial piety’, especially bloody love, as the basis of origin. It is believed that people only realize the fantasy of generalized benevolence based on the basis of special blood roots… Once conflict occurs, Confucianism will In order to maintain the principle of loyalty and filial piety with the ultimate meaning, we do not recognize the principle of relying on benevolence and conception from the position, and even violate the principle of cheating and harming others and loving others and helping others, we will be in trouble to resolve the deep paradox and form bad habits in our national life. href=”https://www.taiwanlovelog.com/Penny/”>The disadvantages of the Baocai Club”. [5]
No need to say anything, Confucianism has the weaknesses of light logic, analyzes the logic and breaks in its academic theory, and examines the teachings of Han Chinese in the way of thinking, which is effective. The ultimate meaning. Logic is a moral norm about the thinking process. Respecting logic helps to improve the effectiveness of thinking and more effectively grasp the laws of the object world. However, logic cannot be equal to thinking about oneself. Specifically, the question of how to evaluate the meaning of Confucian thinking can be said
發佈留言